MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2009

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2009
61.1% pass rate
from 113 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.88% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.88% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.88% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.88% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.88% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.88% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.88% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Drag link end (171 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Lock stop
  • 8.8% fail on Visibility
    • 6.2% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on View to rear (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Mirrors (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 8.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Body (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Other body component (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Panel
    • 2.7% fail on Seats (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Driver's seat (31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Passenger's seat (41 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.88% fail on Tank
    • 0.88% fail on Load security
      • 0.88% fail on Dropside
        • 0.88% fail on Other dropside component
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.88% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.88% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.88% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.88% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.88% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.88% fail on Brake pads
  • 8.0% fail on Suspension
    • 6.2% fail on Axles (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on King pins (6096 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Axle
      • 0.88% fail on Stub axle
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (32 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 8.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.2% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.88% fail on Requirements
      • 0.88% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages