Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2009
57.5% pass rate
from 146 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 13% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Front lamps (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear lamps (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.68% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Battery (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.68% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.68% fail on Horn
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Axles (617 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on King pins (6105 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.68% fail on Stub axle
    • 6.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.68% fail on Front
  • 12% fail on Brakes (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Components
        • 0.68% fail on Pipes
        • 0.68% fail on Hoses
      • 0.68% fail on Leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal
        • 0.68% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Mirrors (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Exhaust system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Tank
      • 0.68% fail on Pipe
      • 0.68% fail on Cap
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Condition
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.68% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Steering system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Drag link end (149 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.68% fail on Free play
        • 0.68% fail on Steering box
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Body condition (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seats (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Drivers (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Road Wheels (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)

Search Good Garages