Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.0% pass rate
from 138 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Switch
    • 5.8% fail on Position lamps (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Position lamp (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Outline marker lamps (348 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Outline marker lamp (377 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Electrical wiring (43 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies) (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.72% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.72% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt
          • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.72% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.72% fail on Pedal
    • 0.72% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.72% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.72% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Axles (54 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on King pins (4536 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Stub axle
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (42 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.72% fail on Springs
      • 0.72% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.72% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.72% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Condition
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 8.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Washers
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Condition of glass (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Windscreen (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 8.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.5% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.72% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.72% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.72% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.72% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Tank (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seats (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's seat (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.72% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.72% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.72% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.72% fail on Body
      • 0.72% fail on Other body component
    • 0.72% fail on Cabs
      • 0.72% fail on Steps
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.9% fail on Drag link end (109 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.72% fail on Steering play
      • 0.72% fail on Steering box
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.72% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.72% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages