Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2008
55.5% pass rate
from 209 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Rear lamps (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.96% fail on All position lamps (24 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Fog lamp (13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Tell tale (35 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Switch
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.96% fail on Electrical wiring (27 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Trailer electrical socket (60 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Horn
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Axles (528 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on King pins (3860 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Stub axle (1669 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.9% fail on Front (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs (2714 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Condition (3619 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.48% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 8.1% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (17 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Components
        • 0.96% fail on Hoses
        • 0.48% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.48% fail on Leaks
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.7% fail on Condition
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.48% fail on Size/type
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Cap (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Tank
    • 0.96% fail on Emissions
    • 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.8% fail on Steering (200% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Drag link end (89 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Seats (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Passengers
      • 0.48% fail on Drivers
    • 0.96% fail on Spare wheel (98 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.96% fail on Towbars (361 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Towbar
    • 0.48% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.96% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.96% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages