MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2006

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2006
55.6% pass rate
from 153 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.65% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 7.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Battery(ies) (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.65% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 7.2% fail on Axles (26 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on King pins (2516 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Stub axle (579 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 2.0% fail on Leaf springs (685 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (1509 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.65% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 0.65% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Body (13 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Other body component (24 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Tank
    • 2.0% fail on Towbar (184 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Other towbar components (217 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Towbar condition
    • 2.0% fail on Seats (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Driver's seat (17 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Bumpers (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Cabs (57 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (61 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Chassis
      • 0.65% fail on Chassis condition
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 5.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt
          • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.65% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.65% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.65% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.65% fail on Pedal
    • 0.65% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 9.2% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Drag link end (62 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Condition
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on View to rear (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Mirrors (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
  • 6.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment (86 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 2.6% fail on Road Wheels (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages