Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2006
49.0% pass rate
from 194 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (93% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Rear lamps (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Front lamps
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.52% fail on Switch
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.52% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage condition (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment
    • 6.7% fail on Axles (217 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on King pins (2261 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Stub axle (608 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 1.0% fail on Leaf springs (879 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (1439 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.52% fail on Front
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.7% fail on Hub components
      • 5.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.0% fail on Brake calipers (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Front wheels (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.1% fail on Components
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.52% fail on Hoses
        • 0.52% fail on Valves
    • 0.52% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Mirrors (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Windscreen (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 8.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Size/type
  • 8.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.52% fail on Tank
      • 0.52% fail on Cap
    • 0.52% fail on Emissions
  • 7.2% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.1% fail on Drag link end (37 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Steering arm
  • 4.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seats (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Passengers (15 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Drivers (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Speedometer
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.52% fail on Requirements
      • 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.52% fail on Towbars
    • 0.52% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages