Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2005
61.7% pass rate
from 206 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Tell tale (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Switch
    • 5.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.97% fail on Electrical wiring (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Horn
    • 0.49% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.49% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components
      • 4.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.97% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.9% fail on Components
        • 0.97% fail on Pipes
        • 0.97% fail on Hoses
        • 0.49% fail on Valves
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.97% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
        • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.49% fail on Lever
      • 0.49% fail on Cable
    • 0.49% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.49% fail on Components
        • 0.49% fail on Valves
  • 11% fail on Suspension (44% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.97% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.9% fail on Axles (85 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on King pins (2003 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.9% fail on Front
      • 0.49% fail on Rear
    • 1.9% fail on Leaf springs (1219 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (4007 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres
    • 6.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
  • 8.3% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Steering system (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Drag link end (40 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Other components
        • 0.49% fail on Steering pivot point
  • 7.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.49% fail on Cap
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Requirements
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
  • 1.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.49% fail on Body security
    • 0.49% fail on Body condition
    • 0.49% fail on Seats
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers
  • 0.97% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages