MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2005

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2005
59.7% pass rate
from 159 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.63% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.63% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.63% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.63% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.63% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.63% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.9% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.63% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves (186 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.63% fail on Brake fluid
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Axles (23 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on King pins (1551 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Leaf springs (553 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Leaf spring (726 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.63% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on View to rear (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Mirrors (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
  • 8.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Seats (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Driver's seat (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.63% fail on Tank
      • 0.63% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 0.63% fail on Body condition
      • 0.63% fail on Other body component
    • 1.3% fail on Cabs (41 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Steps
      • 0.63% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.63% fail on Chassis
      • 0.63% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.63% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.63% fail on Transmission
      • 0.63% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.63% fail on Prop shaft
  • 6.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Requirements
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.63% fail on Condition
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.63% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.63% fail on Steering shaft
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.63% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.63% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.63% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.63% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.63% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages