Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results
Registered in 200454.8% pass rate
from 168 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(46% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
7.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(190% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Flashing type
(190% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
7.7% fail on
Flashing type
(190% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp
- 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Electrical wiring (32 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.60% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.60% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.60% fail on Position lamp
- 0.60% fail on Rear reflectors
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
22% fail on
Brakes
(59% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
11% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.6% fail on Brake pads
-
2.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.4% fail on Brake discs
-
3.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake control
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Valves (80 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves (23 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.60% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
6.0% fail on
Axles
(36 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.8% fail on King pins (1583 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Stub axle (299 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.6% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Linkage
- 0.60% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
3.0% fail on
Springs
-
3.0% fail on
Leaf springs
(725 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Leaf spring (870 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Spring saddle
- 0.60% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
- 0.60% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
-
3.0% fail on
Leaf springs
(725 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.60% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.0% fail on
Axles
(36 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(67% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Exhaust system (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Seats
(10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Driver's seat (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Passenger's seat
-
1.8% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.60% fail on Tank
-
1.8% fail on
Towbar
(136 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Other towbar components (216 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Towbar condition
-
1.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.60% fail on
Chassis
- 0.60% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.60% fail on Bumpers
-
0.60% fail on
Body
- 0.60% fail on Other body component
- 0.60% fail on Floor
-
0.60% fail on
Cabs
- 0.60% fail on Prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Visibility
- 8.9% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Washers
-
1.2% fail on
View to rear
- 0.60% fail on Mirrors
- 0.60% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
11% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Track rod end
- 3.6% fail on Drag link end (39 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Ball joint
-
0.60% fail on
Other components
- 0.60% fail on Steering component
- 0.60% fail on Locking devices
-
0.60% fail on
Steering play
- 0.60% fail on Steering box
-
11% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 5.4% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
3.6% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
3.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(75% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.60% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.60% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.60% fail on Other leaks
-
1.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(75% better than other 2004 cars)