Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2003

55.0% pass rate

from 100 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

19% fail on Brakes
- 15% fail on Brake performance (95% worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 8.0% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 8.0% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      - 7.0% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      - 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 6.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
  - 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 2.0% fail on Rbt
      - 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.0% fail on Brake discs
- 1.0% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 1.0% fail on Servos
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.0% fail on Lever
- 1.0% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 1.0% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.0% fail on Flashing type
    - 3.0% fail on Side repeaters
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.0% fail on Headlamp
  - 1.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.0% fail on Position lamps (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Position lamp (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 1.0% fail on Horn
14% fail on Suspension
- 6.0% fail on Axles (36 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 5.0% fail on King pins (1115 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Stub axle
- 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 3.0% fail on Springs
  - 3.0% fail on Leaf springs (477 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 1.0% fail on Leaf spring
    - 1.0% fail on Shackle bracket
    - 1.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
- 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 2.0% fail on Other suspension component
  - 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (31 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
9.0% fail on Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 2.0% fail on View to rear (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Mirrors (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
9.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.0% fail on Seats (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Driver's seat (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Passenger's seat
- 2.0% fail on Fuel system
  - 2.0% fail on Tank (17 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Transmission
  - 1.0% fail on Prop shafts
    - 1.0% fail on Prop shaft
7.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 7.0% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 6.0% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Requirements
  - 1.0% fail on Condition
5.0% fail on Steering
- 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 4.0% fail on Track rod end
  - 2.0% fail on Drag link end (18 times worse than other 2003 cars)
5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.0% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 3.0% fail on Emissions not tested (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 2.0% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 2.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
4.0% fail on Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.0% fail on Condition
2.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 2.0% fail on Registration plates
2.0% fail on Road Wheels
- 2.0% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)