Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2003
53.4% pass rate
from 148 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 14% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 13% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Switch
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Outline marker lamps (198 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Outline marker lamp (233 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.68% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.68% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 9.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.68% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 8.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 6.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt
          • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.7% fail on Parking brake control (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.68% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.68% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.68% fail on Cable
        • 0.68% fail on Linkage
    • 0.68% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.68% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.68% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 8.8% fail on Axles (67 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on King pins (2392 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.68% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 2.0% fail on Leaf springs (629 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.68% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.68% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Steering (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering linkage components (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 4.7% fail on Drag link end (51 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on Tank (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 0.68% fail on Panel
      • 0.68% fail on Other body component
    • 0.68% fail on Transmission
      • 0.68% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.68% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.68% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.68% fail on Door condition
    • 0.68% fail on Seats
      • 0.68% fail on Driver's seat
  • 8.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres
    • 6.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.68% fail on Size/type
    • 0.68% fail on Condition
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.0% fail on Requirements (35 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.68% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.68% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages