Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2002
58.5% pass rate
from 106 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 3.8% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.94% fail on Horn
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.94% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.94% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.94% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.4% fail on Rbt (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.94% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.94% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.94% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.94% fail on Lever
    • 1.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Valves (48 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.94% fail on Servos
    • 0.94% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.94% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.94% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 8.5% fail on Washers
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on View to rear
      • 1.9% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.94% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.94% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Axles (43 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on King pins (1579 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Stub axle
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.9% fail on Springs
      • 1.9% fail on Leaf springs (406 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.94% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.94% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.94% fail on Transmission
      • 0.94% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.94% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.94% fail on Body
      • 0.94% fail on Panel
    • 0.94% fail on Cabs
      • 0.94% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.5% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.9% fail on Locking devices (44 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint
  • 5.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.8% fail on Requirements (70 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.94% fail on Condition
  • 0.94% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.94% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.94% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.94% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.94% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.94% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.94% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.94% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp

Search Good Garages