Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2002
42.0% pass rate
from 112 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 14% fail on Position lamps (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Switch (63 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Tell tale
    • 12% fail on Stop lamp
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.9% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on All direction indicators (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
    • 8.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.89% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.89% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.89% fail on Horn
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 14% fail on Front wheels (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.3% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes
        • 1.8% fail on Hoses
        • 1.8% fail on Valves
    • 3.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.89% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.89% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Wheel bearings (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Front (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Leaf springs (558 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (1262 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.89% fail on Shackle
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.7% fail on Axles (40 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on King pins (768 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.89% fail on Stub axle
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Windscreen
  • 13% fail on Tyres
    • 9.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Size/type
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 13% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Tank (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Pipe
      • 0.89% fail on Cap
      • 0.89% fail on System
    • 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.89% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.89% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.5% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Body security
    • 0.89% fail on Doors
      • 0.89% fail on Passengers other
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.89% fail on Requirements
  • 3.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages