MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2002

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2002
65.8% pass rate
from 73 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 6.8% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Valves
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 11% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on View to rear (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Mirrors (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.4% fail on Floor
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.4% fail on Cabs
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Axles (35 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on King pins (1036 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.4% fail on Leaf spring
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Condition
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Size/type
  • 5.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.7% fail on Drag link end (24 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.4% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 1.4% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages