Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2001
53.0% pass rate
from 115 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 18% fail on Position lamps (160% worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 12% fail on Front lamps (130% worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear lamps (4 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (94% worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.87% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.87% fail on Switch
    • 4.3% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.87% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.87% fail on Switch
    • 2.6% fail on Horn
    • 0.87% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.87% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.87% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Rear wheels (120% worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 7.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 8.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.0% fail on Components
        • 3.5% fail on Pipes
        • 1.7% fail on Valves
        • 0.87% fail on Hoses
        • 0.87% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.87% fail on Operation
      • 0.87% fail on Leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Hub components
      • 4.3% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical components (5 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Restricted movement
  • 16% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.0% fail on Washers
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Mirrors (10 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Suspension (45% better than other 2001 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Axles (99 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on King pins (1905 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Leaf springs (172 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (684 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.87% fail on Shackle
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.7% fail on Front
    • 0.87% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.87% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.87% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.87% fail on Component mounting
  • 12% fail on Tyres
    • 7.0% fail on Condition
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.87% fail on Emissions
    • 0.87% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.87% fail on Tank
      • 0.87% fail on System
    • 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 10% fail on Steering (120% worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Steering system (130% worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Track rod end (200% worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Drag link end (26 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Locking devices
  • 8.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (170% worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Body condition
    • 2.6% fail on Seats (6 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Passengers (13 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Drivers
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis
    • 0.87% fail on Doors
      • 0.87% fail on Drivers
    • 0.87% fail on Load security
      • 0.87% fail on Dropside
  • 7.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.6% fail on Requirements (31 times worse than other 2001 cars)
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.87% fail on Towbars
    • 0.87% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages