MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2000

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2000
66.2% pass rate
from 77 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.3% fail on Pivot
    • 3.9% fail on Parking brake control (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Horn
  • 9.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Chassis
      • 3.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.9% fail on Body (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Mounting fixings (123 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Body condition
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission
      • 1.3% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.3% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.3% fail on Cabs
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 7.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.3% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.6% fail on Suspension (83% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages