Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 1999
60.3% pass rate
from 68 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 15% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 7.4% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 5.9% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators
    • 8.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Tell tale
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Rear wheels
      • 10% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
    • 4.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 4.4% fail on Condition
    • 4.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.9% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Operation
      • 1.5% fail on Components
        • 1.5% fail on Valves
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.9% fail on Axles (66 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on King pins (1274 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 4.4% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Component mounting
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 7.4% fail on Steering system
      • 5.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.5% fail on Drag link end
  • 7.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 5.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Condition
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.5% fail on Seats
      • 1.5% fail on Drivers
    • 1.5% fail on Load security
      • 1.5% fail on Dropside
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages