Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results
Registered in 199952.1% pass rate
from 48 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Headlamp aim
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp
-
4.2% fail on
Position lamps
(22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Position lamp (23 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 4.2% fail on Battery(ies) (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
13% fail on
Headlamp aim
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
23% fail on
Brakes
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Service brake performance
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Rbt
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 15% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Rbt
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 13% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 8.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
4.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
- 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
-
19% fail on
Service brake performance
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake control
- 2.1% fail on Lever
- 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.1% fail on Load sensing valves
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.1% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 2.1% fail on Linkage
-
2.1% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
17% fail on
Visibility
- 8.3% fail on Washers
- 6.3% fail on Wipers
-
2.1% fail on
Condition of glass
- 2.1% fail on Windscreen
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.2% fail on
Fuel system
(6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Pipe
- 2.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
4.2% fail on
Body
(12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Other body component (28 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.1% fail on
Chassis
- 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 2.1% fail on Floor
-
2.1% fail on
Seats
- 2.1% fail on Driver's seat
-
8.3% fail on
Steering
-
8.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Drag link end
-
8.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 8.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension
-
2.1% fail on
Axles
- 2.1% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
2.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.1% fail on
Axles
-
4.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
(7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
-
4.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
(7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 2.1% fail on Registration plates