Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 1999
57.1% pass rate
from 63 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.3% fail on Seats (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Driver's seat (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.2% fail on Body (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Body condition
      • 1.6% fail on Panel
      • 1.6% fail on Other body component
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Tank
      • 1.6% fail on Pipe
    • 1.6% fail on Load security
      • 1.6% fail on Dropside
        • 1.6% fail on Dropside condition
    • 1.6% fail on Cabs
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Switch
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 16% fail on Visibility
    • 13% fail on Wipers (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Washers
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.2% fail on Load sensing valves (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 7.9% fail on Steering
    • 7.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 6.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.6% fail on Steering arm
  • 6.3% fail on Suspension
    • 1.6% fail on Axles
      • 1.6% fail on King pins
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.6% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 6.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Requirements
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.8% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages