MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » ASX » 2016

Mitsubishi ASX MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.6% pass rate
from 3,223 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi ASX is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.0% fail on Visibility (26% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (60% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.031% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Brakes (63% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (43% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads (44% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.22% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Cable
        • 0.031% fail on Linkage
        • 0.031% fail on Pivot
    • 2.0% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.031% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.031% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.093% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.093% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.062% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.093% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.093% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.093% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.031% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.062% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.031% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (32% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.96% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.031% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.25% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.093% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamps (70% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.062% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.031% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.031% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 0.59% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joints (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.093% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.031% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.25% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.093% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.062% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.062% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.031% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.031% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.062% fail on Transmission
      • 0.062% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.062% fail on Joints
    • 0.031% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.031% fail on Towbar
      • 0.031% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.031% fail on Body
      • 0.031% fail on Other body component
  • 0.22% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.031% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.12% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.12% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.062% fail on Steering
    • 0.062% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.062% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.031% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.031% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages