Mitsubishi ASX MOT Results

Registered in 2016
89.3% pass rate
from 3,326 tests in 2020
(13% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi ASX is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (63% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (66% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.030% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.45% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.060% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.060% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.030% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.030% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.030% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.030% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 3.6% fail on Visibility (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers (49% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Washers
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.090% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.8% fail on Brakes
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.060% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.060% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.060% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.030% fail on Cable
        • 0.030% fail on Lever
    • 0.48% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.060% fail on Lever
    • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.060% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.030% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.030% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.030% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 1.6% fail on Tyres (56% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 0.21% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.060% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.060% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.060% fail on Body
      • 0.060% fail on Other body component
    • 0.030% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.030% fail on Seats
      • 0.030% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.090% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.060% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.060% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.060% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.060% fail on Suspension (90% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.030% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.060% fail on Seat belt installation check (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.030% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.030% fail on Steering
    • 0.030% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.030% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi ASX (2010 on)
    Well-equipped as standard. Impressive Real MPG scores. Plenty of room for five plus luggage. Five-star Euro NCAP rating.

    Search Good Garages