Mitsubishi ASX MOT Results

Registered in 2015
84.0% pass rate
from 4,561 tests in 2020
(9.1% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi ASX is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.3% fail on Visibility (51% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers (87% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Washers (36% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.022% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.022% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.022% fail on View to rear
      • 0.022% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.1% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (28% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (39% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads (40% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake discs and drums (67% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Brake discs (67% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Lever (13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (54% better than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake imbalance (56% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.022% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control (99% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Lever (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (42% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (1.1% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Anti-lock braking system (66% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.044% fail on Flexible brake hoses (16% worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (0.34% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (5.3% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Headlamps (66% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Headlamp levelling device (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Direction indicators (49% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Flashing type (49% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (31% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (74% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Electrical equipment (65% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Battery(ies) (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.022% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.022% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (26% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Size/type
  • 0.42% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Compression ignition (6.2% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (26% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (4.6% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.044% fail on Spark ignition (90% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.022% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.35% fail on Suspension (85% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bars (25% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.044% fail on Shock absorbers (87% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Suspension arms (93% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8.0% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.22% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (29% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Seat belts (24% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (20% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (34% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Body (35% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Other body component (68% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.022% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.022% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.022% fail on Doors
      • 0.022% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.022% fail on Door condition
    • 0.022% fail on Undertray
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels (40% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment (19% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.066% fail on Identification of the vehicle (67% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Registration plates (67% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.066% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Steering linkage components (79% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Steering play
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi ASX (2010 on)
    Well-equipped as standard. Impressive Real MPG scores. Plenty of room for five plus luggage. Five-star Euro NCAP rating.

    Search Good Garages