MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » ASX » 2015

Mitsubishi ASX MOT Results

Registered in 2015
84.0% pass rate
from 4,615 tests in 2021
(16% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi ASX is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.5% fail on Brakes (56% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (26% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads (42% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake discs and drums (47% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Brake discs (47% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.043% fail on Lever
        • 0.022% fail on Cable
        • 0.022% fail on Linkage
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.087% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.087% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.087% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.087% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.087% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.76% fail on Rigid brake pipes (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.022% fail on Pedal
    • 0.11% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.065% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.065% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.043% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.022% fail on Reservoirs
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (34% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Washers
    • 0.043% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.043% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 2.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.50% fail on Headlamps (53% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp (82% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.33% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.043% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.065% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.043% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.022% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.022% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 1.5% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Anti-roll bars (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joints (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.26% fail on Springs (84% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Coil springs (84% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Coil spring (84% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Suspension arms (75% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.022% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.022% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.022% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.43% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (62% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.087% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.087% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (70% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.13% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Catalyst emissions (81% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.043% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.022% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.022% fail on Undertray
  • 0.39% fail on Body, chassis, structure (58% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.065% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.022% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.022% fail on Joints
      • 0.022% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.022% fail on Joints
    • 0.065% fail on Body
      • 0.065% fail on Other body component
    • 0.043% fail on Seats
      • 0.043% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.022% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.022% fail on Doors
      • 0.022% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.022% fail on Door condition
  • 0.37% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.17% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.15% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.022% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.087% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.087% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages