MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » ASX » 2012

Mitsubishi ASX MOT Results

Registered in 2012
78.2% pass rate
from 2,296 tests in 2021
(29% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi ASX is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.5% fail on Brakes
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.96% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.96% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.48% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.044% fail on Rbt
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.087% fail on Pedal
      • 0.044% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.044% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.044% fail on Lever
    • 0.044% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 5.0% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.044% fail on Linkage
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.44% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.044% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.044% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (61% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.61% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Headlamps (89% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp (88% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.087% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.044% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.044% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.044% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.044% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.044% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.044% fail on Switch
  • 3.5% fail on Visibility
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (36% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2012 cars)
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.96% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Spark ignition (52% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions (75% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.13% fail on Transmission (88% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Body
      • 0.087% fail on Other body component
    • 0.087% fail on Undertray
    • 0.044% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.044% fail on Tank
    • 0.044% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.044% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.044% fail on Seats
      • 0.044% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.30% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.087% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 0.13% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages