MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » ASX » 2011

Mitsubishi ASX MOT Results

Registered in 2011
78.0% pass rate
from 2,513 tests in 2020
(25% better than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi ASX is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.6% fail on Brakes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.040% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.080% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (70% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.040% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.040% fail on Rbt
          • 0.040% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (180% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Electronic stability control (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.040% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.040% fail on Lever
    • 0.040% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.040% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.040% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.040% fail on Other components
  • 5.8% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.040% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension arms (82% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.20% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.040% fail on Axles
      • 0.040% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.040% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.040% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.040% fail on Suspension unit
  • 5.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.080% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.96% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.92% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.040% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.96% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.080% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.040% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.040% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.040% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamps (93% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp (93% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Stop lamp (97% better than other 2011 cars)
  • 3.3% fail on Visibility (25% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.84% fail on Washers (58% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.040% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.040% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.040% fail on View to rear
      • 0.040% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2011 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.040% fail on Hose
      • 0.040% fail on Pipe
    • 0.080% fail on Transmission (91% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.040% fail on Joints
      • 0.040% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.040% fail on Joints
    • 0.080% fail on Body
      • 0.080% fail on Other body component
    • 0.080% fail on Doors
      • 0.080% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.080% fail on Door condition
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition (81% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.040% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.040% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.040% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.040% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.40% fail on Spark ignition (63% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.84% fail on Steering
    • 0.80% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.80% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.040% fail on Steering play
      • 0.040% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.36% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.040% fail on Airbags
      • 0.040% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi ASX (2010 on)
    Well-equipped as standard. Impressive Real MPG scores. Plenty of room for five plus luggage. Five-star Euro NCAP rating.

    Search Good Garages