Mitsubishi ASX MOT Results

Registered in 2010
73.0% pass rate
from 2,110 tests in 2020
(21% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi ASX is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.5% fail on Brakes
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Rbt
          • 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.047% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Anti-lock braking system (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
      • 0.095% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.14% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.095% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.047% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.047% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.047% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 6.5% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.047% fail on Linkage
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Coil springs (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.095% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.095% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.095% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.047% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.047% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.047% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 6.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.047% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.66% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamps (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.095% fail on Trailer electrical socket (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.047% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.047% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.047% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.047% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.047% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.24% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.047% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.047% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.047% fail on View to rear
      • 0.047% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.095% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.095% fail on Body
      • 0.095% fail on Panel
    • 0.047% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.047% fail on Tank
    • 0.047% fail on Transmission
      • 0.047% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.047% fail on Joints
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.57% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.047% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.047% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.047% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.33% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment
    • 0.047% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.095% fail on Seat belt installation check (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Belt(s)/padding (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi ASX (2010 on)
    Well-equipped as standard. Impressive Real MPG scores. Plenty of room for five plus luggage. Five-star Euro NCAP rating.

    Search Good Garages