Mitsubishi ASX MOT Results

Registered in 2010
80.2% pass rate
from 1,777 tests in 2017
(32% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi ASX is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.9% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front lamps (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Rear lamps (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Headlamps (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Battery
    • 0.056% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.056% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.056% fail on Individual lamps
  • 5.0% fail on Brakes
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.34% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.23% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.79% fail on Components
        • 0.73% fail on Pipes (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Hoses
    • 0.28% fail on ABS
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.056% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.056% fail on Condition
    • 0.056% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.056% fail on Pedal
        • 0.056% fail on Anti-slip
  • 4.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.90% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.056% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Suspension (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.84% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension arms (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.056% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.056% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 2.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.056% fail on Cap
      • 0.056% fail on System
  • 0.45% fail on Steering
    • 0.45% fail on Steering system
      • 0.39% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.056% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.45% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.34% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.11% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.17% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.056% fail on Passengers front
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.056% fail on Condition
    • 0.056% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi ASX (2010 on)
    Well-equipped as standard. Impressive Real MPG scores. Plenty of room for five plus luggage. Five-star Euro NCAP rating.

    Search Good Garages