MINI Hatch MOT Results
Registered in 201788.1% pass rate
from 47,144 tests in 2021
(16% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the MINI Hatch is unusually good or bad.
-
4.1% fail on
Visibility
(10% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Washers (32% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.057% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0021% fail on Window
-
0.023% fail on
View to rear
- 0.021% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0021% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.015% fail on Bonnet
-
3.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition (11% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (28% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Size/type (58% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.0021% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.19% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(33% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(33% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp (33% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(33% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Direction indicators
(39% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Flashing type
(39% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (35% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Individual direction indicators (51% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0021% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.15% fail on
Flashing type
(39% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Headlamps
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Headlamp (85% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.064% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.055% fail on Horn (93% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.042% fail on
Position lamps
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Switch
- 0.013% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (94% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Reversing lamps
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Reversing lamps (69% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Rear reflectors
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.1% fail on
Brakes
(48% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(44% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Brake pads (40% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake discs (64% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0064% fail on Lever
- 0.0042% fail on Cable
-
0.74% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Brake performance
(57% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.025% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(58% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(55% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.0064% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(55% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0042% fail on
Parking brake performance
(91% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0042% fail on
Rbt
(90% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0021% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.0021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.0042% fail on
Rbt
(90% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.032% fail on Electronic braking system (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.011% fail on Electronic stability control (74% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.011% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.0064% fail on
Parking brake control
(92% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.0021% fail on Lever
-
0.0042% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(93% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Pedal (83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0042% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0042% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0042% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.0021% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.0021% fail on Additional braking device
-
0.83% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(44% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(47% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Spark ignition
(36% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (43% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.019% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.0021% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0021% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.083% fail on
Compression ignition
(61% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (89% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0021% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.0021% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.20% fail on
Spark ignition
(36% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0085% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0042% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0042% fail on Other leaks
-
0.0042% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0042% fail on Sound deadening material
-
0.28% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
(48% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment (38% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.21% fail on Registration plates
- 0.0021% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(25% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.10% fail on Condition
- 0.074% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.15% fail on
Suspension
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Suspension arms
(70% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.015% fail on Suspension arm (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.034% fail on Shock absorbers (67% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.028% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0064% fail on Linkage
- 0.0064% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0042% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0042% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0021% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.0021% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.0021% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.011% fail on
Springs
(97% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0085% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0021% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.0085% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Wheel bearings (85% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0042% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0021% fail on Ball joint
-
0.0021% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0021% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.0021% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0021% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.070% fail on
Suspension arms
(70% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(62% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Body
- 0.025% fail on Other body component
- 0.0042% fail on Panel
- 0.0021% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.023% fail on
Transmission
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Seats
- 0.019% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.017% fail on
Engine mounting
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Engine mounting condition (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0021% fail on Bracket
- 0.015% fail on Bumpers
- 0.0085% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0042% fail on
Doors
(87% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0021% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0021% fail on Door condition
-
0.0021% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0021% fail on Door condition
-
0.0021% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.0021% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0021% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.032% fail on
Body
-
0.017% fail on
Steering
(89% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0042% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0021% fail on Locking devices
- 0.0042% fail on Steering column
-
0.0021% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0021% fail on Steering rack
-
0.011% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0021% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0021% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review