MINI 1000 MOT Results
Registered in 199965.2% pass rate
from 782 tests in 2021
(14% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the MINI 1000 is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(86% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(96% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
(96% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
(96% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
(59% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (55% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.90% fail on Horn
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.51% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.13% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.13% fail on Switch
-
0.13% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
6.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(86% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.77% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.7% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.51% fail on
Suspension rods
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.13% fail on
Axles
- 0.13% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.13% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.13% fail on Operation
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
9.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.38% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.26% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.13% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.13% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.13% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
9.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.6% fail on
Brakes
(25% better than other 1999 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.13% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
-
5.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(69% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Brake pads (81% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.13% fail on Cable
- 0.13% fail on Clevis joint
- 0.13% fail on Pivot
-
0.13% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.13% fail on Brake discs
-
0.26% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Rigid brake pipes (87% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.26% fail on Lever
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.0% fail on
Steering
(90% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Steering linkage components
(60% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Steering column
-
0.13% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.13% fail on Universal joint
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
6.3% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Washers
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
0.13% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
6.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(33% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.5% fail on
Transmission
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.5% fail on Joints
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.13% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
1.2% fail on
Seats
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.51% fail on
Chassis
- 0.51% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.26% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.13% fail on Bracket
- 0.13% fail on Floor
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(52% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.90% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.26% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.64% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.7% fail on
Tyres
(61% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.77% fail on Tread depth (67% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.90% fail on Registration plates