MINI 1000 MOT Results
Registered in 199658.8% pass rate
from 895 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the MINI 1000 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.89% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Tell tales (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
5.8% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
0.11% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.7% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.34% fail on Tell tale
-
3.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.1% fail on Front lamps
- 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (48% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Lamp (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Battery
- 0.78% fail on Horn
- 0.34% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
8.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.4% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Component mounting (53% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Spring mounting
- 5.5% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Attachment (16 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.22% fail on Condition
-
2.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Front (100% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Rear
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(52% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(51% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (51% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(51% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Radius arms
(7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
0.89% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.89% fail on Condition
- 0.56% fail on General condition (15 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.56% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.45% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.11% fail on
Axles
- 0.11% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
8.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
16% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(43% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 12% fail on Emissions (89% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.45% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.34% fail on Cap
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.4% fail on Front wheels (55% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.89% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Brake operation
- 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(64% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Components
(68% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pipes (69% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Hoses (70% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.11% fail on Servos
- 0.45% fail on Leaks
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
1.8% fail on
Components
(68% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Mechanical components
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Clevis joint
-
0.34% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.34% fail on
Pedal
- 0.22% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.34% fail on
Pedal
-
0.34% fail on
Hub components
(85% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Brake pads
- 0.11% fail on Brake discs
- 0.11% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.11% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.11% fail on Leaks
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.8% fail on Washers (96% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.56% fail on Mirrors
- 0.45% fail on Windscreen
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
8.8% fail on
Steering
(86% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
-
1.0% fail on
Steering control
(4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Steering column (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Steering wheel (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Steering shaft
- 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
-
8.2% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.9% fail on Body condition
-
2.0% fail on
Seats
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Chassis
- 0.34% fail on Engine mountings (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Speedometer
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
- 0.11% fail on Passengers front
-
4.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.45% fail on Condition
- 0.34% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Requirements
-
0.22% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.6% fail on
Tyres
(40% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Size/type
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
- 0.11% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Condition