MINI 1000 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
58.0% pass rate
from 953 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the MINI 1000 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.21% fail on Tell tales (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps (54% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.31% fail on Switch
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.84% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (64% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 1.0% fail on Hazard warning (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.7% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Component mounting (47% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment (18 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (82% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Front (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Rear
    • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.31% fail on Condition (28 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.31% fail on General condition (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.10% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Axles
      • 0.10% fail on Clearance
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (42% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 12% fail on Emissions (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system (37% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.42% fail on Cap
      • 0.21% fail on System
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (46% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance (70% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Rear wheels (69% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Front wheels (53% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.63% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.10% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (49% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Components (54% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Pipes (58% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Hoses
        • 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.10% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.10% fail on Valves
      • 0.52% fail on Leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.63% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.52% fail on Hub components (75% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake pads (85% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.10% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal
        • 0.31% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Free play
        • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.10% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.52% fail on Steering control
      • 0.31% fail on Steering column
      • 0.21% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.10% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.10% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Rams
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.9% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.73% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.2% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Drivers (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Body condition
    • 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis
    • 0.31% fail on Body security
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mountings
  • 5.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Installation check (18 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Anchorage's
        • 0.10% fail on Belt(s)/padding
      • 0.10% fail on Requirements
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (53% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.10% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.10% fail on Towbars
    • 0.10% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages