MINI 1000 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
61.7% pass rate
from 1,025 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the MINI 1000 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Switch
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.098% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (48% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (48% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.098% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.59% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Horn
      • 0.098% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.98% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (72% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (83% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (94% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Non catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.78% fail on Catalytic converter (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.098% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 0.098% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.098% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.098% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.49% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.39% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.098% fail on Other leaks
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (19 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (65% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (41% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.39% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.20% fail on Suspension rod (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.098% fail on Axles
      • 0.098% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance (30% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (70% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (93% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (54% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.098% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (94% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (90% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.098% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.098% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.88% fail on Rigid brake pipes (69% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Mechanical brake components (70% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.29% fail on Cable
        • 0.098% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.098% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.098% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.098% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.098% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.29% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
      • 0.098% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.098% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.098% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.098% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.098% fail on Other components
  • 10% fail on Visibility (47% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.29% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.29% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.098% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.098% fail on View to rear
      • 0.098% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (28% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.098% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.098% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (50% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission (55% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (51% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.59% fail on Chassis (64% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Chassis condition (64% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Other body component
      • 0.098% fail on Body condition
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.098% fail on Pipe
    • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Bracket (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.29% fail on Floor
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.098% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.098% fail on Hinge
      • 0.098% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.098% fail on Door condition
    • 0.098% fail on Bumpers
  • 7.6% fail on Steering (73% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (58% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.098% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.098% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.29% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.29% fail on Steering column
    • 0.29% fail on Steering play
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.098% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.098% fail on Universal joint
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 0.98% fail on Tread depth (54% better than other 1995 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.098% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.098% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.098% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages