MINI 1000 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
57.1% pass rate
from 924 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the MINI 1000 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (22% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim (37% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps (77% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.65% fail on Tell tales (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 5.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.32% fail on Switch
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps (56% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.22% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.22% fail on Dipswitch (13 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Horn (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 0.32% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Suspension (31% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Prescribed areas (69% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Subframe mounting (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Component mounting
    • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Couplings
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.0% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Rear
    • 3.8% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on General condition (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.32% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 16% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (71% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 11% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Cap
      • 0.43% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (48% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Rear wheels (87% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance (79% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (47% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Components (64% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pipes (63% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Hoses (70% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.87% fail on Leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Operation
    • 0.65% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Hub components
      • 0.22% fail on Brake pads (79% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.54% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.43% fail on Cable
      • 0.11% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.11% fail on Condition
        • 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.9% fail on Steering (73% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Steering system (89% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Free play
        • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.97% fail on Steering control (200% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Steering column (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Washers
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis
    • 2.3% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Passengers (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Body condition
    • 0.43% fail on Doors
      • 0.43% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.22% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.22% fail on Body security
  • 5.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment
      • 0.11% fail on Installation check
        • 0.11% fail on Anchorage's
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.76% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages