MINI 1000 MOT Results
Registered in 198266.3% pass rate
from 205 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1982 cars and highlighted areas where the MINI 1000 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
5.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
5.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.0% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.4% fail on Horn
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.98% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
5.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(94% worse than other 1982 cars)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 1982 cars)
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(100% worse than other 1982 cars)
- 11% fail on Non catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 1982 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.49% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.49% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(100% worse than other 1982 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.49% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 1982 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 1982 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
3.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.98% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt
- 0.98% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.49% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt
-
5.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 1982 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.98% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.49% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs
-
0.49% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.49% fail on Cable
-
0.49% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.49% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.49% fail on Valves
- 0.49% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.49% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.49% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.49% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.49% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.49% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.49% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
-
3.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(7 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.98% fail on Ball joint
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.0% fail on
Other suspension component
(5 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers
-
3.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(7 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.4% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Chassis
- 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.49% fail on Strengthening plate
-
2.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.49% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.49% fail on Strengthening plate
- 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.98% fail on
Seats
- 0.49% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.49% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.49% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.49% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.49% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
4.4% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Washers
-
0.98% fail on
View to rear
- 0.98% fail on Mirrors
-
5.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.9% fail on Steering rack
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 0.98% fail on Steering column (5 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Steering wheel
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
-
3.4% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth (4 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts