Microcar M.GO MOT Results

Registered in 2010

70.7% pass rate

from 123 tests in 2020

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Microcar M.GO is unusually good or bad.

11% fail on Brakes
- 8.9% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 6.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.81% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.81% fail on Service brake performance
  - 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.81% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.81% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.81% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.81% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.81% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
7.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.4% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.81% fail on Dipswitch
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.81% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.81% fail on All position lamps
- 0.81% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.81% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.81% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.81% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.81% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.81% fail on Switch
- 0.81% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.81% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.81% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.81% fail on Horn
7.3% fail on Suspension
- 4.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.6% fail on Ball joint
6.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.6% fail on Fuel system (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.81% fail on Pipe
  - 0.81% fail on System
- 1.6% fail on Bumpers (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Transmission
  - 0.81% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.81% fail on Joints
4.9% fail on Steering
- 4.9% fail on Steering gear (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.9% fail on Steering rack (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.9% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested
2.4% fail on Visibility
- 1.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.81% fail on Bonnet