MG ZT MOT Results
Registered in 200660.9% pass rate
from 243 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the MG ZT is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp
-
0.41% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.6% fail on
Position lamps
(72% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Front lamps (82% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.82% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.41% fail on Tell tale
- 0.41% fail on Battery
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
9.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.1% fail on Front wheels
- 0.82% fail on Brake imbalance
-
5.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.8% fail on
Components
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Pipes (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Components
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs
- 1.2% fail on ABS
-
0.82% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.82% fail on Condition
-
9.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.82% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Attachment
-
2.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Rear
-
0.82% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.82% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.82% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.82% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.41% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.41% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.41% fail on Condition
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
-
5.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(200% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.41% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.41% fail on Condition
-
4.9% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
- 0.41% fail on Bonnet
- 0.41% fail on Windscreen
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.2% fail on Emissions
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.82% fail on Cap
- 0.41% fail on System
- 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering system
- 2.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
-
0.41% fail on
Steering control
- 0.41% fail on Steering column
-
0.41% fail on
Power steering
- 0.41% fail on Rams
-
2.5% fail on
Steering system
-
0.82% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.41% fail on Condition
- 0.41% fail on Attachment
-
0.82% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.82% fail on
Seats
- 0.82% fail on Passengers (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Seats
-
0.41% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.41% fail on Registration plate