MG ZR MOT Results
Registered in 200257.6% pass rate
from 434 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the MG ZR is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Horn
-
2.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.92% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.92% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.46% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(66% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Rbt
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.5% fail on
Rbt
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 0.69% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.92% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.92% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.69% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.46% fail on Hand lever
- 0.23% fail on Pedal
-
0.69% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.69% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.46% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.46% fail on Servos (37 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Other components (20 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.23% fail on Servos
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(66% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.1% fail on
Transmission
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.4% fail on Joints
-
0.69% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.69% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.92% fail on
Chassis
- 0.92% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.69% fail on
Seats
- 0.69% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.23% fail on
Body
- 0.23% fail on Panel
- 0.23% fail on Floor
-
5.1% fail on
Transmission
-
12% fail on
Suspension
- 7.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.92% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.92% fail on
Springs
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.23% fail on Coil spring
- 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.23% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.23% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.23% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.23% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.23% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
-
9.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.46% fail on
Emission control equipment
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Catalytic converter (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.46% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
8.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
9.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.5% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
-
4.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.69% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
(52% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.69% fail on Tread depth (79% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Steering
(89% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.23% fail on Registration plates