MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » MG » MGTF » 2010

MG MGTF MOT Results

Registered in 2010
77.6% pass rate
from 219 tests in 2021
(36% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the MG MGTF is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Reversing lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Reversing lamps (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.91% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.46% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.46% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.46% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.46% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 5.9% fail on Brakes
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.46% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.46% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.91% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.91% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.46% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.91% fail on Wipers
  • 4.1% fail on Suspension (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Sub-frames (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.46% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.46% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.46% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.46% fail on Steering play
      • 0.46% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.46% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.91% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.46% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.46% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages