MG MGTF MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.4% pass rate
from 229 tests in 2020
(31% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the MG MGTF is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.6% fail on Brakes
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.87% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Clevis joint (1517 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Cable
      • 0.44% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.44% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.44% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Hand lever
  • 6.6% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.87% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.87% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.87% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.44% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.44% fail on Horn
    • 0.44% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.44% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.44% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.44% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.87% fail on Suspension arm (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (109 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.44% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.87% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
  • 0.87% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.87% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.87% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested

Search Good Garages