MG MGTF MOT Results

Registered in 2009
79.3% pass rate
from 276 tests in 2017
(37% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the MG MGTF is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.3% fail on Brakes
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.72% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 2.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.72% fail on ABS
  • 5.1% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.72% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.72% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Battery
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.36% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.36% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 0.36% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.36% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.36% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 5.1% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Sub-frames (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (66 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Attachment (69 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.72% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.72% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
    • 0.72% fail on Prescribed areas (40 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Subframe mounting (166 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.72% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.36% fail on Chassis
  • 1.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.36% fail on Emissions
  • 0.72% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
  • 0.36% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages