MG MGF MOT Results
Registered in 199557.4% pass rate
from 108 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the MG MGF is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.6% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Tell tale
- 0.93% fail on Switch
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp
-
3.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.7% fail on Individual lamps
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Battery
-
2.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.9% fail on Horn
-
19% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 19% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Front wheels
- 5.6% fail on Rear wheels
-
2.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 2.8% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Components
- 0.93% fail on Pipes
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake control components
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Pedal
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Pedal
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.93% fail on ABS
-
0.93% fail on
Hub components
- 0.93% fail on Brake pads
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.7% fail on Condition (31 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.7% fail on Component mounting
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.93% fail on General condition
-
0.93% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.93% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.93% fail on Front suspension joints
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
8.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Condition
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.93% fail on Size/type
-
7.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.93% fail on Condition
- 0.93% fail on Attachment
- 0.93% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
- 3.7% fail on Washers
- 1.9% fail on Windscreen
-
4.6% fail on
Steering
-
3.7% fail on
Power steering
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Electronic power steering (410 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Operation
-
0.93% fail on
Steering system
- 0.93% fail on Track rod end
-
3.7% fail on
Power steering
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.9% fail on
Doors
- 0.93% fail on Drivers
- 0.93% fail on Passengers front
- 0.93% fail on Speedometer
- 0.93% fail on Body condition
-
0.93% fail on
Seats
- 0.93% fail on Drivers
-
1.9% fail on
Doors