MG MGF MOT Results

Registered in 1995
57.4% pass rate
from 108 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the MG MGF is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.6% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.9% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.93% fail on Switch
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.7% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Battery
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
  • 19% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 19% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.6% fail on Rear wheels
    • 2.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.8% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Components
        • 0.93% fail on Pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on ABS
    • 0.93% fail on Hub components
      • 0.93% fail on Brake pads
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Condition (31 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.7% fail on Component mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on General condition
    • 0.93% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.93% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.93% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.93% fail on Size/type
  • 7.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
      • 0.93% fail on Attachment
      • 0.93% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Electronic power steering (410 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Operation
    • 0.93% fail on Steering system
      • 0.93% fail on Track rod end
  • 4.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.9% fail on Doors
      • 0.93% fail on Drivers
      • 0.93% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.93% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.93% fail on Body condition
    • 0.93% fail on Seats
      • 0.93% fail on Drivers

Search Good Garages