MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » MG » MGF » 1995

MG MGF MOT Results

Registered in 1995
66.2% pass rate
from 68 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 1995 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the MG MGF is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 15% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (17% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (36% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (13% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (11% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (11% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment (83% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 10% fail on Brakes (9.0% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Brake performance (31% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 7.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (51% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (7.8% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (16% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
  • 10% fail on Visibility (53% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers (18% better than other 1995 cars)
  • 10% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms (38% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (34% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension rods
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 1.5% fail on Operation
  • 7.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (26% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system (40% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Front passenger's door (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Door condition (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (34% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Steering (32% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering wheel
    • 1.5% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages