MG MG6 MOT Results
Registered in 201567.8% pass rate
from 500 tests in 2021
(61% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the MG MG6 is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.40% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.40% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.40% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.40% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.40% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.20% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Brakes
(140% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
-
1.6% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(160% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
3.0% fail on
Brake performance
(180% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
- 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
- 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.20% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt
- 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Electronic stability control (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.20% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.80% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Hand lever
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.40% fail on Size/type (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(170% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.2% fail on Coil spring
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(170% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Visibility
- 2.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
-
2.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(140% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.20% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(180% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
(23 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Front passenger's door
(43 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Door condition (46 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Other passenger's door
(22 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Door condition (23 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Front passenger's door
(43 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Transmission
-
0.60% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.60% fail on Joints
-
0.60% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.40% fail on
Engine mounting
(55 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Engine mounting condition (76 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Body
- 0.20% fail on Other body component
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
(23 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Road Wheels
(7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Steering
-
0.20% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.20% fail on Steering rack
-
0.20% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.20% fail on Track rod end
-
0.20% fail on
Steering play
- 0.20% fail on Steering rack
-
0.20% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
MG 6 (2011 - 2016)
Spacious cabin with enough room for a family and a large boot. Decent performance and handling. Much improved from 2015.