Mercedes-Benz Viano MOT Results
Registered in 201068.6% pass rate
from 491 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz Viano is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.20% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.20% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
-
7.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Brakes
-
6.7% fail on
Brake performance
(68% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.20% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
-
0.20% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.20% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.20% fail on Brake discs
-
0.20% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.20% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.81% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pedal
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Servos
-
0.20% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.20% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
6.7% fail on
Brake performance
(68% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Suspension
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.61% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.41% fail on Linkage
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Coil spring (70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Ball joint
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.20% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
5.9% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.81% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.61% fail on
Body
(6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Other body component (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Panel
- 0.41% fail on Bumpers
-
0.41% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.20% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.20% fail on
Transmission
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.20% fail on Joints
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.20% fail on
Load security
- 0.20% fail on Loading door
-
0.20% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.20% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.20% fail on Undertray
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
-
0.20% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.61% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Requirements
-
2.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.41% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.81% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.20% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.20% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.20% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.81% fail on
Steering
-
0.41% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.41% fail on Steering rack
-
0.41% fail on
Steering linkage components
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Track rod end
-
0.41% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.81% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.81% fail on Attachment
-
0.41% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.41% fail on Registration plates