Mercedes-Benz SLK MOT Results
Registered in 201072.7% pass rate
from 2,140 tests in 2021
(25% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz SLK is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
9.4% fail on
Springs
(74% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Coil springs
(74% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Coil spring (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Coil springs
(74% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.9% fail on Ball joint (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.047% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.19% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.047% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.14% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.093% fail on Shock absorbers (89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.047% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.047% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
9.4% fail on
Springs
(74% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
(85% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.47% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
(85% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
(47% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(49% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.33% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.093% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.093% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (95% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.047% fail on Horn
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Brakes
(29% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.89% fail on
Service brake performance
(56% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.89% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
- 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
-
0.28% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.093% fail on Service brake imbalance (78% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(54% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Brake pads (52% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(50% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Brake discs (58% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Brake drums (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.047% fail on Pedal
- 0.047% fail on Hand lever
-
0.093% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.047% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.047% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.093% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.047% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.047% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.047% fail on Lever
-
2.4% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2010 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
(23% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Size/type
-
1.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.84% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.79% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.047% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.047% fail on NOx sensor
-
0.047% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.047% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.047% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.047% fail on Sound deadening material
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Visibility
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Wipers (70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Washers (91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Bonnet
-
0.047% fail on
View to rear
- 0.047% fail on Mirrors
-
0.89% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Exhaust system (56% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.093% fail on
Sub-frame
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Sub-frame condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Sub-frame
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.047% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.65% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.65% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.42% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.42% fail on Registration plates
-
0.37% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.23% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
-
0.23% fail on
Steering
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.047% fail on Steering rack
-
0.19% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.047% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz SLK (2004 - 2011)
Georgeous jewel like looks reminiscent of a miniature McLaren SLR. Electric folding hard top. A much desired and aspired to car.