Mercedes-Benz SL MOT Results
Registered in 200981.6% pass rate
from 533 tests in 2021
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz SL is unusually good or bad.
-
7.5% fail on
Suspension
(49% better than other 2009 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Springs
-
5.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 5.1% fail on Coil spring
-
5.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Ball joint
- 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.75% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.75% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.19% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.19% fail on Suspension unit
-
5.1% fail on
Springs
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.75% fail on Tread depth (78% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
-
3.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.75% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.94% fail on
Headlamp aim
(70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim (67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp
-
0.19% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Brakes
(68% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.56% fail on
Service brake performance
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
- 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.94% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.19% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.19% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.19% fail on Brake pads
-
0.19% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Visibility
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Wipers (73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Washers (88% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Spark ignition
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.75% fail on
Spark ignition
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Steering
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.19% fail on Pipe
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Attachment