Mercedes-Benz SL MOT Results
Registered in 199778.6% pass rate
from 707 tests in 2021
(45% better than other 1997 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz SL is unusually good or bad.
-
8.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(35% better than other 1997 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.14% fail on Matched pair
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.57% fail on Stop lamp (83% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(68% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(68% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.57% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(68% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.14% fail on Position lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
-
3.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Brakes
(62% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.6% fail on
Brake performance
(78% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(71% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(70% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance (74% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(70% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Service brake performance
(77% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
(77% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
(77% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(83% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
-
0.85% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(71% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.85% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.85% fail on Brake pads
-
0.85% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.85% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.85% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.28% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.57% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.57% fail on Lever
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Pedal
-
0.14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
3.8% fail on
Visibility
(44% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.99% fail on Washers (68% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
View to rear
- 0.14% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension
(70% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.57% fail on
Springs
-
0.57% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.57% fail on Coil spring
-
0.57% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.42% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.28% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (94% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.14% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
3.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(53% better than other 1997 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 1997 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(55% better than other 1997 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (46% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.14% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
3.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(55% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.42% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.99% fail on Tread depth
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
(65% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
- 0.42% fail on Drag link end
- 0.28% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.14% fail on
Power steering
- 0.14% fail on Other components
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(88% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Exhaust system (91% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.14% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.14% fail on
Seats
- 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.14% fail on Undertray
-
0.57% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(85% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.57% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.28% fail on Registration plates
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Attachment