Mercedes-Benz S-Class MOT Results
Registered in 198874.1% pass rate
from 424 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1988 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz S-Class is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.47% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.24% fail on Switch
-
2.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.47% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.94% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.47% fail on Horn
-
0.47% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.47% fail on Position lamp
-
0.24% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.24% fail on Switch
-
0.24% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.94% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.94% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Linkage
- 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.24% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.47% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.24% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.24% fail on
Springs
-
0.24% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.24% fail on Coil spring
-
0.24% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.24% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.24% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.24% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
-
7.3% fail on
Brakes
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.24% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.24% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.94% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.94% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.47% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt
- 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.24% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(4 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 1988 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.47% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.47% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.24% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.24% fail on Lever
-
0.24% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.24% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.24% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.24% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.24% fail on Brake pads
-
0.24% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.4% fail on
Visibility
- 4.5% fail on Washers
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
-
5.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.94% fail on
Chassis
- 0.94% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.71% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.71% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.71% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.24% fail on Tank
- 0.24% fail on Pipe
- 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.47% fail on
Transmission
-
0.47% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.47% fail on Flexible couplings (18 times worse than other 1988 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.47% fail on
Body
- 0.24% fail on Panel
- 0.24% fail on Other body component
- 0.47% fail on Floor
- 0.24% fail on Bumpers
-
0.24% fail on
Seats
- 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.24% fail on Passenger's seat
-
3.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.47% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.71% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.71% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
2.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.7% fail on Condition
- 0.47% fail on Tread depth
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
(64% better than other 1988 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.94% fail on Track rod end
- 0.47% fail on Drag link end
-
0.24% fail on
Power steering
- 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.47% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.47% fail on Registration plates
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.24% fail on Condition
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment