Mercedes-Benz M-Class MOT Results
Registered in 200867.8% pass rate
from 3,150 tests in 2021
(25% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz M-Class is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp (32% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(97% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
(97% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (47% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
(97% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.98% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (53% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.51% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.51% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.16% fail on Horn
- 0.063% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.16% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.16% fail on Position lamp
- 0.095% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
(29% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.19% fail on
Decelerometer
(10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
(29% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Parking brake performance
(45% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.032% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.063% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.032% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(80% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.063% fail on Service brake imbalance (88% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(80% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.063% fail on Brake linings
-
0.60% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(61% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Brake discs (61% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.63% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.095% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.38% fail on Lever
-
0.063% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.063% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.032% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.032% fail on Pedal
-
0.032% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.032% fail on Servos
-
0.032% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Springs
-
5.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 5.2% fail on Coil spring
-
5.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.67% fail on
Suspension arms
(87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Ball joint (95% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.35% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joints (84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.032% fail on Linkage
- 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings (75% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Bellows (101 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Levelling valve
-
0.032% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
-
5.2% fail on
Springs
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
(21% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.095% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(36% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(43% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.89% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (93% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (89% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.095% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.60% fail on
Spark ignition
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Catalyst emissions (96% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.032% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(43% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Fluid leaks
(83% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks (89% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.032% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.032% fail on Other leaks
-
0.063% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.063% fail on Undertray
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Visibility
(62% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Wipers (53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Washers (72% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.16% fail on Windscreen
-
0.13% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
2.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(64% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
(53% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (58% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.13% fail on Prop shaft (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Bearing housing (17 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Hose (19 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Pipe
- 0.063% fail on System
- 0.29% fail on Exhaust system (88% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.095% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.032% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.063% fail on Undertray
- 0.032% fail on Bumpers
-
0.032% fail on
Body
- 0.032% fail on Other body component
-
0.032% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.032% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.032% fail on
Cabs
- 0.032% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
(53% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.63% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.63% fail on Condition
- 0.60% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.63% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.67% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.57% fail on Attachment
- 0.095% fail on Condition
-
0.60% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.57% fail on Registration plates
- 0.032% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.32% fail on
Steering
(88% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Steering gear
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack (71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.095% fail on
Power steering
- 0.095% fail on Operation
- 0.032% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.063% fail on
Steering linkage components
(97% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.13% fail on
Steering gear
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz ML-Class (2005 - 2012)
Comfortable ride, tidy handling, excellent engines including 320 CDI, plenty of safety kit, upmarket interior.