Mercedes-Benz M-Class MOT Results
Registered in 200557.4% pass rate
from 1,780 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz M-Class is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.1% fail on Stop lamp (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Flashing type
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on All direction indicators (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.056% fail on Arm
-
5.8% fail on
Flashing type
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.45% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.17% fail on Dipswitch (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.73% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.73% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.056% fail on Switch
-
0.73% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.17% fail on Horn
- 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.17% fail on Position lamp
- 0.056% fail on Switch
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
7.6% fail on
Springs
(62% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Coil springs
(64% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Coil spring (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Coil springs
(64% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joints (86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.5% fail on Ball joint (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.84% fail on
Other suspension component
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings (73% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.11% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.056% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.056% fail on Levelling valve
- 0.11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (94% better than other 2005 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Springs
(62% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
7.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
- 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.056% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.056% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.056% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
- 0.96% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Service brake performance
(79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance (84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(59% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.73% fail on Brake discs
-
0.39% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.34% fail on Cable
- 0.056% fail on Lever
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(59% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.84% fail on Electronic stability control (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.45% fail on Lever
-
0.28% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.17% fail on Hand lever
- 0.11% fail on Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.11% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.11% fail on Servos
-
7.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.7% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Drag link end
-
2.2% fail on
Steering gear
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.22% fail on Other components
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.056% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.056% fail on Pump
- 0.056% fail on Rams
-
0.39% fail on
Steering play
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Steering column
-
6.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.056% fail on Catalytic converter
-
1.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Catalyst emissions (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Fluid leaks
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Engine oil leaks (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Other leaks
- 0.056% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
5.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Visibility
(25% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 2.5% fail on Wipers (33% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
View to rear
- 0.22% fail on Mirrors
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
(23% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition (39% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
4.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(51% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Transmission
(56% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Joints (60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.17% fail on Joints
- 0.056% fail on Prop shaft
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Exhaust system (75% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
- 0.056% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.056% fail on System
- 0.39% fail on Bumpers
-
0.39% fail on
Doors
-
0.34% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.34% fail on Door condition
-
0.056% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.056% fail on Door condition
-
0.34% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.28% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.056% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.17% fail on
Body
- 0.17% fail on Other body component
-
0.11% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (82% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Chassis
- 0.11% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.11% fail on Undertray
-
0.056% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.056% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.056% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.056% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.056% fail on Passenger compartment
-
1.6% fail on
Transmission
(56% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.84% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.73% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas (86% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.84% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.39% fail on Registration plates
-
0.056% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.056% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz ML-Class (2005 - 2012)
Comfortable ride, tidy handling, excellent engines including 320 CDI, plenty of safety kit, upmarket interior.