Mercedes-Benz M-Class MOT Results
Registered in 199955.3% pass rate
from 465 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz M-Class is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(37% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Side repeaters
-
4.7% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.43% fail on Switch (38 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.22% fail on Position lamp
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
8.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(67% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.22% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.22% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.86% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.22% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt
-
0.65% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(67% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs
-
4.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Electronic stability control (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.22% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Pedal
- 0.22% fail on Hand lever
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.22% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.22% fail on Other components
-
8.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
6.7% fail on
Springs
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Coil springs
(200% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Coil springs
(200% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.65% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.22% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.22% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.22% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
-
6.7% fail on
Springs
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.2% fail on
Chassis
- 2.2% fail on Chassis condition
- 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.86% fail on
Body
- 0.43% fail on Other body component
- 0.22% fail on Body condition
- 0.22% fail on Panel
-
0.65% fail on
Doors
-
0.43% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.43% fail on Door condition
-
0.22% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.22% fail on Door condition
-
0.43% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.65% fail on
Seats
- 0.43% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.43% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.43% fail on
Transmission
(85% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.22% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.22% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.22% fail on Joints
-
0.22% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.22% fail on Bumpers
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
7.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.7% fail on Washers
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.22% fail on Bonnet
-
0.22% fail on
View to rear
- 0.22% fail on Mirrors
-
6.7% fail on
Steering
(80% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
-
1.3% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.3% fail on Steering rack
-
0.43% fail on
Power steering
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.22% fail on
Steering play
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
-
5.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.43% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.43% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.86% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.22% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.22% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.22% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
4.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.86% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.22% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.7% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on Size/type
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.86% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.5% fail on
Road Wheels
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates