Mercedes-Benz GLA MOT Results
Registered in 201790.8% pass rate
from 12,942 tests in 2021
(34% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz GLA is unusually good or bad.
-
2.5% fail on
Tyres
(26% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (31% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth (24% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Size/type
-
2.1% fail on
Visibility
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Wipers (59% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Washers
-
0.10% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.10% fail on Windscreen
-
0.015% fail on
View to rear
- 0.015% fail on Mirrors
-
1.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(40% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.023% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.25% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.25% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.11% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.0077% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.25% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.16% fail on
Headlamps
(68% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.0077% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.070% fail on Stop lamp (79% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (81% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.015% fail on Horn
-
0.023% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0077% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0077% fail on Position lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Brakes
(39% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(28% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Brake pads (28% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0077% fail on Brake linings
-
0.19% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Brake discs (46% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Brake performance
(55% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Service brake performance
(62% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Rbt
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.0077% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0077% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.10% fail on
Rbt
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.031% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0077% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.023% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.023% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.023% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0077% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.023% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.0077% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.0077% fail on
Rbt
- 0.0077% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.0077% fail on
Rbt
-
0.11% fail on
Service brake performance
(62% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.023% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.015% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0077% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.0077% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.0077% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0077% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(28% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(57% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.023% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Body
- 0.023% fail on Panel (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0077% fail on Other body component
-
0.0077% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0077% fail on Pipe
- 0.0077% fail on Bumpers
- 0.0077% fail on Undertray
-
0.44% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(66% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Registration plates (66% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(45% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.023% fail on Catalyst emissions (78% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0077% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0077% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
0.14% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.015% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0077% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0077% fail on Other leaks
-
0.29% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(45% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Ball joint
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0077% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.070% fail on
Springs
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(66% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.015% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.0077% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0077% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.085% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.023% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.070% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.062% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.046% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0077% fail on Attachment
- 0.0077% fail on Requirements
-
0.015% fail on
Airbags
(5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Drivers airbag (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Steering
(85% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Steering linkage components
(85% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0077% fail on Steering column
-
0.015% fail on
Steering linkage components
(85% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0077% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0077% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz GLA (2014 - 2020)
Available with two or four-wheel drive. Reasonable load space. Fine ride quality. High-quality interior finish.