Mercedes-Benz CLS MOT Results
Registered in 201580.8% pass rate
from 3,015 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLS is unusually good or bad.
-
6.9% fail on
Tyres
(60% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.033% fail on Size/type
-
3.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(170% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(180% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(95% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
1.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.033% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(180% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Brakes
-
1.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake performance
(68% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.033% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.033% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.066% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.066% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.033% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.066% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(48% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(48% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Brake pads (52% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Brake linings
-
0.33% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.33% fail on Brake discs
-
0.93% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(48% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.27% fail on Lever
- 0.13% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.033% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.033% fail on Hand lever
-
0.033% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.033% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.033% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.033% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.033% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
1.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(48% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.33% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.33% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.33% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.066% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.100% fail on
Headlamps
(91% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.033% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.033% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.033% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.033% fail on Horn
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension
(41% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.6% fail on Coil spring
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.100% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.100% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.066% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.033% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.066% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.066% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.033% fail on Pipes
-
0.033% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.033% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.033% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.033% fail on Ball joint
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
-
0.76% fail on
Visibility
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Wipers (84% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Washers (78% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.100% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.100% fail on Windscreen
- 0.033% fail on Bonnet
-
0.66% fail on
Road Wheels
(200% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
-
0.50% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(130% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Registration plates (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.100% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.100% fail on Condition
- 0.100% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.100% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.17% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(82% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.100% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.033% fail on Bumpers
- 0.033% fail on Undertray
-
0.066% fail on
Steering
(84% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.033% fail on Steering rack
-
0.033% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.033% fail on Track rod end
-
0.033% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz CLS (2011 - 2018)
Big CO2 reductions. Four-cylinder CLS 250 CDI available at last. Precisely-built interior. Retains unique style of original CLS. Comes with full LED headlights.