Mercedes-Benz CLK MOT Results
Registered in 200860.8% pass rate
from 3,031 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLK is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(42% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
-
10% fail on
Springs
(70% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Coil springs
(71% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 10% fail on Coil spring (72% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Coil springs
(71% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(42% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (71% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.96% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.73% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint
- 0.099% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.066% fail on Linkage
- 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.46% fail on Wheel bearings (48% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
- 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension rods
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.033% fail on Ball joint
-
0.066% fail on
Sub-frames
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.033% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Brakes
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
-
0.66% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt
- 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance (47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.033% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.033% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.033% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt
-
0.56% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(33% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.73% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.73% fail on Brake discs
-
0.033% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.033% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.53% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system (65% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.033% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.099% fail on Pedal
- 0.099% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.099% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.099% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.066% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.066% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.033% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.033% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(44% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(42% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.56% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (73% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.033% fail on Position lamp
- 0.033% fail on Switch
-
0.066% fail on
Electrical equipment
(87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.033% fail on Horn
-
0.033% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.033% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
5.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
-
0.33% fail on
View to rear
- 0.33% fail on Mirrors
-
0.13% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.13% fail on Windscreen
- 0.033% fail on Bonnet
-
2.8% fail on
Steering
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.099% fail on Ball joint
-
0.23% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.16% fail on Steering rack
- 0.066% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Power steering
- 0.033% fail on Operation
- 0.033% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.066% fail on
Steering play
- 0.066% fail on Steering rack
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(54% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(53% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.40% fail on Catalyst emissions (77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested (76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Compression ignition
(51% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.26% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Fluid leaks
(82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.033% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.033% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.033% fail on Undertray
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(53% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(65% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (42% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.066% fail on Pipe
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.13% fail on
Body
- 0.099% fail on Other body component
- 0.033% fail on Panel
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
-
0.066% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.066% fail on Door condition
-
0.066% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.066% fail on Door condition
-
0.066% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.066% fail on
Transmission
(98% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Belts (19 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Bumpers
- 0.033% fail on Undertray
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.49% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.49% fail on Registration plates
-
0.066% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
(6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Speedometer (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz CLK (2002 - 2009)
Much better second attempt at CLK. Goes well, handles well and is comfortable. Attractive looks.