Mercedes-Benz CLK MOT Results
Registered in 200560.3% pass rate
from 5,475 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLK is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
(28% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(75% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (21% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
9.6% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Mounting
-
9.6% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(30% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Linkage (74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.037% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.018% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings (61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.037% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.11% fail on
Sub-frames
(77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Sub-frame (84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint
-
0.073% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.055% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint
- 0.037% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (98% better than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(75% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp (20% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.49% fail on Side repeaters (39% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.037% fail on Switch
-
0.018% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.018% fail on Arm
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Electrical equipment
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Horn (63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Battery(ies) (81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.13% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.13% fail on Position lamp
-
0.037% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.037% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Brakes
(27% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
(26% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (19% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
(32% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (29% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance (45% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
(32% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake performance
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance (51% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.018% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.018% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.018% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.018% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.018% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.75% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance (57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.75% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (20% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (24% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Brake linings
-
0.49% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs (59% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Cable
- 0.018% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.71% fail on Anti-lock braking system (41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.055% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.51% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.49% fail on Lever
- 0.018% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.24% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses (61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.037% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.018% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.018% fail on Servos
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
(26% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (24% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested (79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.018% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.018% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
1.7% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.055% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.037% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
4.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.29% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.037% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.037% fail on Other leaks
-
0.037% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.037% fail on Undertray
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.091% fail on Size/type (65% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Visibility
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Wipers (42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
View to rear
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
- 0.018% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.20% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
- 0.037% fail on Window (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Bonnet (83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
-
3.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
- 0.037% fail on Drag link end
- 0.037% fail on Steering arm
-
0.64% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.60% fail on Steering rack
- 0.037% fail on Operation
-
0.11% fail on
Power steering
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Operation
- 0.055% fail on Other components
- 0.018% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.018% fail on Rams
-
0.073% fail on
Steering play
- 0.073% fail on Steering rack
-
3.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (40% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
- 0.037% fail on Hose
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.091% fail on Bumpers
- 0.073% fail on Undertray
-
0.037% fail on
Chassis
(90% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Chassis condition (90% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Body
(86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Panel
-
0.018% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.018% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.018% fail on
Transmission
-
0.018% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.018% fail on Joints
-
0.018% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.018% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.018% fail on Boot lid condition
-
1.1% fail on
Road Wheels
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.71% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.71% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz CLK (2002 - 2009)
Much better second attempt at CLK. Goes well, handles well and is comfortable. Attractive looks.