Mercedes-Benz CLK MOT Results
Registered in 200361.1% pass rate
from 4,468 tests in 2021
(14% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLK is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(9.2% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(43% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.16% fail on Suspension arm (60% better than other 2003 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Springs
(97% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (45% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.81% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Linkage
- 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings (55% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers (51% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.067% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.022% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.067% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.022% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.022% fail on Ball joint
-
0.045% fail on
Macpherson strut
(83% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.045% fail on
Sub-frames
(92% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.022% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.045% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (98% better than other 2003 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(43% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(33% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device (56% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Matched pair
- 0.022% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(20% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators (49% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.067% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (70% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp (48% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.29% fail on Horn
- 0.067% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.067% fail on Battery(ies) (81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.11% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.090% fail on Position lamp
- 0.022% fail on All position lamps
-
0.045% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.045% fail on Switch
-
5.4% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (31% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.067% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.067% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
0.81% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(52% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(51% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance (80% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(51% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Parking brake performance
(51% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Rbt
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.067% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.76% fail on
Rbt
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested (59% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.022% fail on Brake linings
-
0.40% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(63% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Brake discs (63% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Linkage
- 0.022% fail on Relay lever
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.69% fail on Electronic stability control (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Anti-lock braking system (67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.27% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.25% fail on Pedal
- 0.022% fail on Hand lever
- 0.090% fail on Flexible brake hoses (76% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.090% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.045% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.045% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.045% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.045% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.045% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Condition (24% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.34% fail on Size/type
-
5.2% fail on
Visibility
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Wipers (26% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
View to rear
- 0.25% fail on Mirrors
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
- 0.067% fail on Bonnet
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(31% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(30% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(46% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (39% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (51% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested (67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.022% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.022% fail on Catalytic converter
-
1.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(76% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.067% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.045% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.022% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.022% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
3.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(46% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Fluid leaks
(61% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks (73% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.045% fail on Other leaks
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(30% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(39% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Seat belts
(84% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Prescribed areas (96% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Pre-tensioners
-
0.045% fail on
Airbags
- 0.022% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.022% fail on Passengers airbag
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
-
3.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.022% fail on Drag link end
- 0.022% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.022% fail on Steering arm
-
0.25% fail on
Steering gear
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack (68% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Steering play
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack
-
0.090% fail on
Power steering
(76% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Operation
- 0.022% fail on Rams
-
3.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(63% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (31% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.090% fail on Pipe
- 0.045% fail on System
- 0.022% fail on Tank
-
0.25% fail on
Seats
- 0.25% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.16% fail on
Body
- 0.090% fail on Other body component
- 0.067% fail on Panel
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
-
0.11% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(88% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (90% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.022% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.067% fail on
Transmission
(98% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.045% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.022% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.067% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.067% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.067% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.045% fail on
Doors
(93% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.045% fail on Door condition
-
0.045% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.045% fail on Undertray
-
0.96% fail on
Road Wheels
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.60% fail on Registration plates
-
0.022% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.022% fail on
Doors
- 0.022% fail on Emergency exits
-
0.022% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz CLK (2002 - 2009)
Much better second attempt at CLK. Goes well, handles well and is comfortable. Attractive looks.