Mercedes-Benz CLK MOT Results
Registered in 200262.3% pass rate
from 2,663 tests in 2021
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLK is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(20% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (39% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(27% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.075% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.075% fail on Switch
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.98% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (56% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.23% fail on Horn
- 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.075% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.075% fail on Position lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(23% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Springs
(65% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Coil springs
(68% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Coil spring (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
5.9% fail on
Coil springs
(68% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Ball joint (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.075% fail on Suspension arm (79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joints (54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.19% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage
- 0.075% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.075% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings (46% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (83% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.075% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.038% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.075% fail on
Sub-frames
(87% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.038% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.038% fail on Shock absorbers
-
5.9% fail on
Springs
(65% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Brakes
(31% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
(44% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(34% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
(35% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (35% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.075% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.038% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
(35% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(61% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(46% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance (68% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(45% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Parking brake performance
(52% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt
(50% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance (50% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt
(50% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(34% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
-
0.79% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.79% fail on Brake discs
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.71% fail on Anti-lock braking system (45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.075% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.30% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Hand lever
-
0.26% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.26% fail on Lever
- 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.075% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.038% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.038% fail on Valves
-
0.075% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.038% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.038% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.038% fail on Additional braking device
-
0.038% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
(44% better than other 2002 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.34% fail on Size/type
-
5.5% fail on
Visibility
(32% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
View to rear
- 0.45% fail on Mirrors
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
0.075% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.075% fail on Windscreen
-
4.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(44% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(40% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(37% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (46% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested (79% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.075% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.34% fail on
Compression ignition
(61% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.075% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.038% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.038% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.038% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.038% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.038% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(37% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Fluid leaks
(87% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.038% fail on Other leaks
-
4.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(40% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering
(25% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.19% fail on Drag link end
- 0.075% fail on Ball joint
- 0.038% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.038% fail on Steering arm
-
0.038% fail on
Other components
- 0.038% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.15% fail on
Steering gear
(84% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Steering play
- 0.11% fail on Steering box (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Steering rack
-
0.11% fail on
Power steering
- 0.038% fail on Operation
- 0.038% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.038% fail on Other components
- 0.038% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.038% fail on Steering column
- 0.038% fail on Electronic power steering
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (64% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Seats
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.30% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
- 0.038% fail on Tank
- 0.038% fail on Hose
- 0.26% fail on Bumpers
-
0.19% fail on
Transmission
(95% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.15% fail on Flexible couplings (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.19% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.15% fail on
Body
- 0.11% fail on Panel
- 0.038% fail on Other body component
-
0.11% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(90% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (90% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Chassis
(83% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Chassis condition (83% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.11% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.075% fail on
Doors
(89% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.038% fail on Door condition
-
0.038% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.038% fail on Door condition
-
0.038% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.038% fail on Undertray
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(28% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.41% fail on
Seat belts
(80% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Road Wheels
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.68% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz CLK (2002 - 2009)
Much better second attempt at CLK. Goes well, handles well and is comfortable. Attractive looks.