Mercedes-Benz CLK MOT Results
Registered in 199965.3% pass rate
from 1,384 tests in 2021
(16% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLK is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamps
(42% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp (47% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Dipswitch (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
5.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.1% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.43% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.14% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.072% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.22% fail on
Electrical equipment
(76% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Horn
-
0.072% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.072% fail on Position lamp
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamps
(42% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension
(40% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Springs
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.6% fail on Coil spring
- 0.072% fail on Mounting
- 0.43% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (37% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(54% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint
- 0.51% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (75% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.072% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.36% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.072% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.072% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.072% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.1% fail on
Springs
-
8.7% fail on
Brakes
(31% better than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.5% fail on
Brake performance
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(80% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(79% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (87% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(79% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(85% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake performance
(76% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.072% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.072% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(66% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.72% fail on Electronic stability control (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Electronic braking system (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.94% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.94% fail on Brake pads
-
0.94% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.94% fail on Brake discs
-
0.94% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.36% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.29% fail on Pedal
- 0.072% fail on Hand lever
-
0.14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.072% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.072% fail on Lever
-
0.072% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.072% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.072% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.072% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
5.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers (45% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Bonnet
-
0.43% fail on
Condition of glass
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Windscreen (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.072% fail on
View to rear
- 0.072% fail on Mirrors
-
5.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(33% better than other 1999 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(35% better than other 1999 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(31% better than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (28% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.22% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.14% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.14% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.072% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.072% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
5.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(31% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.072% fail on Other leaks
-
0.072% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.072% fail on Undertray
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(35% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(49% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Hose (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Pipe
- 0.36% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.29% fail on Tank
- 0.072% fail on System
-
0.72% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(59% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (63% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.072% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.072% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.72% fail on
Seats
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.29% fail on
Chassis
(76% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Chassis condition (76% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Transmission
(90% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.14% fail on Joints
- 0.072% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.072% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.29% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.22% fail on
Body
- 0.22% fail on Other body component
- 0.072% fail on Floor
-
0.072% fail on
Cabs
- 0.072% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.072% fail on Undertray
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
2.2% fail on
Steering
(40% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
-
0.072% fail on
Other components
- 0.072% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.14% fail on
Steering gear
(86% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Steering box
-
0.14% fail on
Steering play
- 0.072% fail on Steering box
- 0.072% fail on Steering rack
-
2.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(57% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts
(70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Road Wheels
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Condition
-
0.65% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.65% fail on Registration plates