Mercedes-Benz CLK MOT Results
Registered in 199864.1% pass rate
from 404 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLK is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.50% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.50% fail on Horn
- 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.25% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
5.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
4.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Electronic stability control (13 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
(49% better than other 1998 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 0.74% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.74% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(77% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(82% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(82% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.50% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(82% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.50% fail on
Rbt
- 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.50% fail on
Rbt
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
- 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.99% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.99% fail on Brake discs
-
0.25% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.25% fail on Linkage
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.50% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.50% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.25% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.25% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.50% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.25% fail on Pedal
- 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
4.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension
(34% better than other 1998 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.2% fail on
Springs
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.5% fail on Coil spring
- 0.25% fail on Mounting
- 0.50% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint
- 0.50% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.99% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.99% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.74% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.25% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.25% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.74% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.50% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers
-
5.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(46% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.25% fail on Strengthening plate
-
1.2% fail on
Chassis
- 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.50% fail on Tank
- 0.50% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.25% fail on Hose
- 0.50% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Bumpers
-
0.50% fail on
Body
- 0.50% fail on Panel
-
0.50% fail on
Seats
- 0.50% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.25% fail on
Transmission
-
0.25% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.25% fail on Joints
-
0.25% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
4.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(47% better than other 1998 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.25% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.25% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.25% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.25% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.74% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.50% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.25% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
4.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(47% better than other 1998 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 0.25% fail on Bonnet
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.0% fail on
Steering
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.7% fail on Track rod end
- 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.2% fail on
Road Wheels
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.74% fail on Registration plates