Mercedes-Benz CLC MOT Results
Registered in 200854.2% pass rate
from 2,655 tests in 2021
(14% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLC is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(75% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
13% fail on
Suspension arms
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 12% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (41% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
12% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
12% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 12% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(97% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
- 0.53% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.45% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
- 0.075% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers (62% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.075% fail on Ball joint
- 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.075% fail on
Sub-frames
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.038% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Suspension arms
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.1% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.34% fail on Position lamp
- 0.038% fail on Switch
-
0.23% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(65% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.038% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Electrical equipment
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Horn
- 0.038% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
5.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
6.5% fail on
Brake performance
(23% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(54% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.038% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.075% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
-
0.64% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.038% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.038% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(54% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(29% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.038% fail on Brake linings
-
0.49% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs (60% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.038% fail on Cable
- 0.038% fail on Lever
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.64% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.075% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.49% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.49% fail on Lever
-
0.34% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.11% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
6.5% fail on
Brake performance
(23% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Tyres
- 5.0% fail on Tread depth (38% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.49% fail on Size/type
-
6.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
-
0.19% fail on
View to rear
- 0.19% fail on Mirrors
- 0.075% fail on Bonnet
- 0.038% fail on Driver's view
-
0.038% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.038% fail on Windscreen
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
(55% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
-
0.075% fail on
Other components
(7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Steering linkage (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Drag link end
- 0.038% fail on Locking devices
-
0.075% fail on
Power steering
- 0.075% fail on Operation
-
0.038% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.038% fail on Steering rack
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(100% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(54% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(54% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.64% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.038% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.038% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.038% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
1.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Catalyst emissions (70% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.038% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.11% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.075% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.038% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.038% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.038% fail on Sound deadening material
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(54% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (53% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Seats
- 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.15% fail on
Boot lid
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.038% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.11% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.075% fail on
Load security
(10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Tailgate
(16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Tailgate condition (19 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Tailgate
(16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Bumpers
-
0.038% fail on
Body
- 0.038% fail on Other body component
-
0.038% fail on
Doors
-
0.038% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.038% fail on Door condition
-
0.038% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.038% fail on Undertray
-
1.3% fail on
Road Wheels
(150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Attachment (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Condition
-
0.98% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.68% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Condition
-
0.53% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.53% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz CLC Coupe (2008 - 2010)
Bolder looking replacement for C-Class Coupe, wide range of engines, neat interior.