Mercedes-Benz CLA MOT Results
Registered in 201684.1% pass rate
from 8,043 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CLA is unusually good or bad.
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
(62% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.012% fail on Size/type
-
2.6% fail on
Visibility
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Washers (53% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Wipers (68% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
-
0.025% fail on
View to rear
- 0.025% fail on Mirrors
-
2.1% fail on
Brakes
(27% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(21% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.34% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.34% fail on Brake discs
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.47% fail on
Brake performance
(35% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake performance
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt
(44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.012% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt
(44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.099% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.062% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.062% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.037% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.062% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.012% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.012% fail on
Rbt
- 0.012% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.012% fail on
Rbt
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake performance
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.087% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.075% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.012% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.037% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.025% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.012% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.012% fail on Hand lever
-
0.012% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.012% fail on Lever
-
0.012% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.012% fail on Brake fluid
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(21% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(49% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Headlamp aim
(32% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.41% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.41% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.075% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.41% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.36% fail on
Headlamps
(50% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.062% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.012% fail on Position lamp
-
0.012% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.012% fail on Switch
-
0.012% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.012% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.012% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.012% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.012% fail on Horn
-
0.97% fail on
Headlamp aim
(32% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(35% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Compression ignition
(68% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.56% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.50% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (70% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.012% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.57% fail on
Compression ignition
(68% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.012% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension
(46% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Springs
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Coil springs
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Coil spring (33% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Coil springs
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension arms
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.012% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.099% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.025% fail on Linkage
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
- 0.025% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.037% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.012% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.012% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.012% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.012% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.012% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.76% fail on
Springs
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.77% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.050% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
0.062% fail on
Airbags
(13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Passengers airbag (59 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(200% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Registration plates (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Attachment (88% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(54% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Bumpers
-
0.050% fail on
Transmission
(77% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Exhaust system (77% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.025% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.025% fail on
Body
- 0.012% fail on Panel
- 0.012% fail on Other body component
- 0.025% fail on Undertray
-
0.012% fail on
Towbar
- 0.012% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.012% fail on
Doors
-
0.012% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.012% fail on Door condition
-
0.012% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.075% fail on
Steering
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.037% fail on Steering rack
-
0.025% fail on
Steering linkage components
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.037% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz CLA (2013 - 2018)
Better quality ride than A-Class. Decent sized boot given its size. Well finished interior. Estate version from 2015.