Mercedes-Benz CL MOT Results
Registered in 201075.0% pass rate
from 60 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CL is unusually good or bad.
-
10% fail on
Brakes
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
3.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 3.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Electronic stability control
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
6.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 6.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
-
1.7% fail on
Visibility
- 1.7% fail on Wipers
-
1.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
1.7% fail on
Transmission
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.7% fail on Flexible couplings
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.7% fail on
Transmission
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mercedes-Benz CL-Class (2007 - 2014)
High performance in comfort. Top quality feel inside. A rare sight on the roads. AMG version is amazingly fast. More aggressive looking following 2010 facelift.