Mercedes-Benz CL MOT Results
Registered in 200475.7% pass rate
from 309 tests in 2017
(49% better than other 2004 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CL is unusually good or bad.
-
9.4% fail on
Brakes
(38% better than other 2004 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.9% fail on
Components
- 4.2% fail on Pipes
- 0.65% fail on Hoses
-
4.9% fail on
Components
-
2.9% fail on
Brake performance
(62% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (69% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Rear wheels (82% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Front wheels
- 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.65% fail on Brake discs
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.65% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on ABS
- 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
-
4.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.7% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(66% better than other 2004 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.97% fail on Individual lamps
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (82% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Headlamps
(80% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Switch
-
0.65% fail on
Position lamps
(90% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Front lamps (88% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.32% fail on Horn
-
7.4% fail on
Suspension
(63% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.6% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.65% fail on
Fluid suspension
(33 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Suspension unit (69 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.32% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.32% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.32% fail on Front
-
0.32% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.32% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.32% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
1.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(81% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers
- 0.32% fail on Mirrors
-
1.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.97% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.97% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.32% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
0.97% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(80% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Emissions
-
0.32% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.32% fail on System
-
0.97% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.65% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
-
0.65% fail on
Steering
(87% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.65% fail on Registration plate
-
0.32% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.32% fail on Engine mountings