Mercedes-Benz CL MOT Results
Registered in 200271.9% pass rate
from 185 tests in 2021
(36% better than other 2002 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CL is unusually good or bad.
-
9.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(42% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Horn
- 0.54% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.54% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
9.7% fail on
Suspension
(42% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.54% fail on Suspension arm
-
2.7% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
- 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
-
1.1% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(22 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Operation
- 0.54% fail on Pipes
- 0.54% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.54% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
-
8.1% fail on
Brakes
- 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.54% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.54% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.54% fail on Brake pads
-
0.54% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.54% fail on Brake discs
-
0.54% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.1% fail on
Brake performance
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
- 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.54% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.54% fail on Hand lever
- 0.54% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.54% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.54% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.54% fail on Size/type
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.8% fail on
Visibility
- 1.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.6% fail on Washers
-
0.54% fail on
View to rear
- 0.54% fail on Mirrors
-
2.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
-
1.1% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.1% fail on Steering rack
- 0.54% fail on Electronic power steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 2.2% fail on Registration plates
-
2.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.1% fail on Joints
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.1% fail on
Seats
- 1.1% fail on Driver's seat
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
-
1.6% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.1% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Attachment