Mercedes-Benz CL MOT Results
Registered in 199781.4% pass rate
from 43 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz CL is unusually good or bad.
-
9.3% fail on
Visibility
- 4.7% fail on Washers
- 2.3% fail on Bonnet
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
-
9.3% fail on
Suspension
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.7% fail on Ball joint
- 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.3% fail on
Springs
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.3% fail on Coil spring
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.3% fail on
Sub-frames
- 2.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
9.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
4.7% fail on
Fluid leaks
(6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 2.3% fail on Other leaks
-
4.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Brakes
-
2.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.3% fail on
Power steering
- 2.3% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
2.3% fail on
Power steering
-
2.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts